Concept visualization of stamped steel inspection and manufacturing research
Industrial development / concept visualization
01

Electrode feasibility

Can a manufacturable carrier reach at least 0.20 Ah per gram of active iron, repeatedly, with parasitic hydrogen controlled? Published iron-air research shows flat iron sheets have limited practical reversible capacity; high-performance electrodes rely on increased active surface area and engineered microstructure.

02

System feasibility

Can the complete carrier exceed roughly 100 Wh/kg, and can the complete system reach or exceed roughly 40% round-trip efficiency including auxiliaries? Does the preservation cycle materially improve 90- and 180-day retention?

03

Economic feasibility

Is there a credible path toward 10–15 currency per kWh of carrier-system capacity at scale? And do target regional use cases remain economically sensible once handling, transport and processing energy are honestly accounted?

04

Freedom to operate

Can the architecture be built through design-around or licensing without infringing active metal-air patents? Patent analysis is a running workstream, not a conclusion.

  1. 01

    Iron utilization

    Can a manufacturable carrier reach ≥0.20 Ah/g active Fe repeatedly?

  2. 02

    Carrier density

    Can the complete carrier exceed ~100 Wh/kg?

  3. 03

    Round-trip efficiency

    Can the complete system reach or exceed ~40% including auxiliaries?

  4. 04

    Hydrogen

    Can parasitic hydrogen be controlled?

  5. 05

    Preservation

    Does the preserve cycle materially improve 90/180-day retention?

  6. 06

    Cost

    Is there a credible path toward ≤10–15 currency/kWh carrier-system capacity at scale?

  7. 07

    Logistics

    Can target regional use cases remain economically sensible after handling and transport?

  8. 08

    Freedom to operate

    Can the architecture be built through design-around or licensing without infringing active metal-air patents?

Current status
  • Concept architectureDefined
  • FEC-1 envelopeIn development
  • ElectrodeIn research
  • PreservationIn research
  • Full-cycle prototypeNot yet validated
  • Commercial certificationNot yet started

Stated plainly, updated as evidence arrives. Development targets are not measured performance.

Feasibility white paper / v0.2 · September 2026

Can a movable iron energy carrier actually work?

Scientific feasibility. Economic model. Competitive landscape. Patent and FTO risk. The kill criteria. The difficult findings are included—credibility is the point.

Download PDF
Fairlight / Reference library

Explore the detail.

Version 0.1 documents are prepared for a future public release. Contact Fairlight for publication updates.

01 / Development document

FEC-1 Development Standard

The proposed carrier envelope and interface framework.

v0.1 · Awaiting public releaseAsk about this document
02 / Development document

Research & Validation Plan

The experimental programme and reporting approach.

v0.1 · Awaiting public releaseAsk about this document
03 / Development document

Preliminary Safety & Hazard Framework

Development-stage hazards and validation priorities.

v0.1 · Awaiting public releaseAsk about this document
04 / Development document

Carrier Passport & Open Ledger Protocol

Physical identity, revision history and lifecycle records.

v0.1 · Awaiting public releaseAsk about this document
05 / Development document

Exchange Custody & Energy Certification Protocol

The proposed relationship between custody and energy state.

v0.1 · Awaiting public releaseAsk about this document
06 / Development document

FEC Governance & Licensing Principles

Proposed governance and principles for participation.

v0.1 · Awaiting public releaseAsk about this document
07 / Development document

Public Technical Whitepaper

The seasonal storage thesis and development architecture.

v0.1 · Awaiting public releaseAsk about this document